All 141 tools / Brand and naming
Suggest branded house, house of brands or endorsed brand for each product from five facts about it
Brand architectureFreeFor brand teams and agencies
25/day
free runs a day, no sign-in.
Before: what you give it
The example input, as typed in. You paste text, CSS, markup or notes.
company: Harbour products: Harbour Pay | audience=same | category=same | risk=low | standalone=no | acquired=no Ledgerly | audience=overlap | category=overlap | risk=low | standalone=no | acquired=yes TinyFox Kids Bank | audience=different | category=overlap | risk=high | standalone=yes | acquired=no
After: what comes back
The first lines of a real run on that input. Nothing here is edited by hand.
3 products for Harbour. Scores weigh audience, category, reputational risk, need for a standalone identity and acquisition history. Harbour Pay: branded house (branded 7, house 0). Pattern: Harbour Pay. Reasons: same audience as the parent; same category as the parent; little reputational risk either way; no need for its own identity. Ledgerly: endorsed brand (branded 4, house 1). Pattern: Ledgerly, from Harbour. Reasons: audience partly overlaps the parent's; adjacent category; little reputational risk either way; no need for its own identity; acquired, so it may carry its own equity. TinyFox Kids Bank: house of brands (branded 0, house 6). Pattern: TinyFox Kids Bank (no visible link to Harbour). Reasons: different audience; adjacent category; a problem on either side could damage the other; needs an identity that can stand alone. Overall: 1 branded house, 1 house of brands, 1 endorsed brand. The portfolio is mixed. A hybrid is normal: group products by model rather than forcing one rule, and write down which products sit in which group so naming stays consistent. ... full output on the tool page
What you get
A model per product with scores, reasons, an example name pattern, and the facts it had to assume
What it cannot do
Scores five inputs you supply; a suggestion to discuss, not a decision, and missing facts are treated as assumptions.
Who it is for
- Brand teams
- Agencies
Free and Pro
| Free | 25 runs a day per IP address, up to 12,000 characters a run. |
|---|---|
| Pro | No daily limit, 300 requests a minute, up to 200,000 characters a run. |
Use it from your assistant
The tool is called brand_architecture_planner. Connect the server once, then ask for it by name or just describe the job. Install steps for each app.
claude mcp add --transport http designers https://designers.allthepossibles.com/mcp
curl -X POST https://designers.allthepossibles.com/api/brand-architecture-planner -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"company":"Harbour","products":"Harbour Pay | audience=same | category=same | risk=low | standalone=no | acquired=no\nLedgerly | audience=overlap | category=overlap | risk=low | standalone=no | acquired=yes\nTinyFox Kids Bank | audience=different | category=overlap | risk=high | standalone=yes | acquired=no"}'
Try it here
The form starts with the same example input, so you can run it first and then swap in your own.
More in brand and naming
- Brand voice
Check copy against your own voice rules and list each line that breaks one, with a replacement.
- Brand guideline checklist
Get a brand guideline skeleton with your decisions filled in and every open decision listed
- Logo size rules
Compute logo clear space and minimum sizes for screen and print, with a size table
- Logo colourways
Pick which logo colourway to use on each background and see which backgrounds need a one-colour version
- Voice consistency
Find which writing samples drift from the rest of your brand voice, and which break your rules
- Naming check
Screen brand name candidates for spelling, pronunciation and typing trouble and look-alike names